About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
george w. bush being unpatriotic, the debt was 9 trillion. so something has gone awry, and hope any we don't see a g.o.p. leadership up there in the house, especially, that is starting to take the baby stepped back because we do have this debt ceiling vote coming up soon. we have to stop the spending -- >> neil: you used to work there, and i always think there's a method to all madness, and i think that someone there, within the ranks of the party establish; must be saying, we can't agreg aggressively push this because maybe in and of itself, pushing the idea of immediately attacking the debt and we don't, immediately backfires on us. >> i'll go bark the words of the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff mullen who said our debt is the most critical national security crisis of the country. that it is coming from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. i believe everybody else in washington, dc would get onboard. you would not think that something such as that financial matter would have something to do with national security but it does you. look at what its going on with the
was unconscionable what bush had done but enough it's fine and we don't have a problem. this democratic budget presented by the house is a joke. the thought of increasing stimulus spending 2.200 billion. solyndra wasn't have no. the -- it is this government's notion that we want to constrain economic growth by continuing to grow the size and scope of the federal government. this would not even balance the budget until something like 2045, and even then wouldn't do it in ten years we would be spending 70% of gdp on public debt. >> neil: i'm going to give the benefit of the doubt to people who can't understand money. money in and my out. that's fine. and we don't have a great spending problem. so, status quo. but we're adding more spending. we're looking at $200 million more among house democrats, $100 million among senate democrats, as if this problem doesn't exist. then we're saying, clearly emboldened by leadership to say, balancing the budget in ten years, it's not the end all be all. >> here's where we might part company. i don't see where republicans doing anything to stop that when you ha
. looked like the real mccoy. >> you'd think we could stop this 100%. the point president bush made is we have to be 100% in telling with these things, otherwise we can have a horrible incident, and it's impossible to be hundred% in anything. impossible to be 100% secure. airplanes are 99.5% secure. but things like this can happen, which gives you a sense that there's something out there and when people get annoyed at delays in the airport and having to be searched, have a little patience. it's still there. and these people have an unusual fascination with airplanes. >> neil: why? >> think how easy to bomb smaller targets. a shopping center, a building or this or that. somehow it's going back to the beginning of islamic terrorism, since the '60s, plane hijacking, plane explosions, locker by. this is their attack of choice. >> neil: have we forgotten that? the attend of home lean security let the saudis decide on who gets here and who doesn't. and most of the 9/11 hijackers were saudi. >> we may have losted a little bit of our obsessiveness about it because it's been a while, and we have a
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3